File CompoScheds.ML (Isabelle2005: October 2005)

# File CompoScheds.ML

    (*  Title:      HOLCF/IOA/meta_theory/CompoScheds.ML
        ID:         $Id: CompoScheds.ML,v 1.22 2005/09/02 15:24:00 wenzelm Exp $
        Author:     Olaf Müller
    *)

    Addsimps [surjective_pairing RS sym];

    (* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

    section "mkex rewrite rules";

    (* ---------------------------------------------------------------- *)
    (*                             mkex2                                *)
    (* ---------------------------------------------------------------- *)

    bind_thm ("mkex2_unfold", fix_prover2 (the_context ()) mkex2_def
    "mkex2 A B = (LAM sch exA exB. (%s t. case sch of  \
    \      nil => nil \
    \   | x##xs => \
    \     (case x of  \
    \       UU => UU   \
    \     | Def y =>  \
    \        (if y:act A then \
    \            (if y:act B then \
    \               (case HD$exA of \
    \                  UU => UU \
    \                | Def a => (case HD$exB of \
    \                             UU => UU \
    \                           | Def b => \
    \                  (y,(snd a,snd b))>>  \
    \                    (mkex2 A B$xs$(TL$exA)$(TL$exB)) (snd a) (snd b)))  \
    \             else   \
    \               (case HD$exA of   \
    \                  UU => UU  \
    \                | Def a => \
    \                  (y,(snd a,t))>>(mkex2 A B$xs$(TL$exA)$exB) (snd a) t)  \
    \             )  \
    \         else   \
    \            (if y:act B then \
    \               (case HD$exB of  \
    \                  UU => UU  \
    \                | Def b =>  \
    \                  (y,(s,snd b))>>(mkex2 A B$xs$exA$(TL$exB)) s (snd b))  \
    \            else  \
    \              UU  \
    \            )  \
    \        )  \
    \      )))");

    Goal "(mkex2 A B$UU$exA$exB) s t = UU";
    by (stac mkex2_unfold 1);
    by (Simp_tac 1);
    qed"mkex2_UU";

    Goal "(mkex2 A B$nil$exA$exB) s t= nil";
    by (stac mkex2_unfold 1);
    by (Simp_tac 1);
    qed"mkex2_nil";

    Goal "[| x:act A; x~:act B; HD$exA=Def a|] \
    \   ==> (mkex2 A B$(x>>sch)$exA$exB) s t =   \
    \       (x,snd a,t) >> (mkex2 A B$sch$(TL$exA)$exB) (snd a) t";
    by (rtac trans 1);
    by (stac mkex2_unfold 1);
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [Consq_def,If_and_if]) 1);
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [Consq_def]) 1);
    qed"mkex2_cons_1";

    Goal "[| x~:act A; x:act B; HD$exB=Def b|] \
    \   ==> (mkex2 A B$(x>>sch)$exA$exB) s t = \
    \       (x,s,snd b) >> (mkex2 A B$sch$exA$(TL$exB)) s (snd b)";
    by (rtac trans 1);
    by (stac mkex2_unfold 1);
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [Consq_def,If_and_if]) 1);
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [Consq_def]) 1);
    qed"mkex2_cons_2";

    Goal "[| x:act A; x:act B; HD$exA=Def a;HD$exB=Def b|] \
    \   ==> (mkex2 A B$(x>>sch)$exA$exB) s t =  \
    \        (x,snd a,snd b) >> \
    \           (mkex2 A B$sch$(TL$exA)$(TL$exB)) (snd a) (snd b)";
    by (rtac trans 1);
    by (stac mkex2_unfold 1);
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [Consq_def,If_and_if]) 1);
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [Consq_def]) 1);
    qed"mkex2_cons_3";

    Addsimps [mkex2_UU,mkex2_nil,mkex2_cons_1,mkex2_cons_2,mkex2_cons_3];

    (* ---------------------------------------------------------------- *)
    (*                             mkex                                 *)
    (* ---------------------------------------------------------------- *)

    Goal "mkex A B UU  (s,exA) (t,exB) = ((s,t),UU)";
    by (simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [mkex_def]) 1);
    qed"mkex_UU";

    Goal "mkex A B nil (s,exA) (t,exB) = ((s,t),nil)";
    by (simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [mkex_def]) 1);
    qed"mkex_nil";

    Goal "[| x:act A; x~:act B |] \
    \   ==> mkex A B (x>>sch) (s,a>>exA) (t,exB)  =  \
    \       ((s,t), (x,snd a,t) >> snd (mkex A B sch (snd a,exA) (t,exB)))";
    by (simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [mkex_def]) 1);
    by (cut_inst_tac [("exA","a>>exA")] mkex2_cons_1 1);
    by Auto_tac;
    qed"mkex_cons_1";

    Goal "[| x~:act A; x:act B |] \
    \   ==> mkex A B (x>>sch) (s,exA) (t,b>>exB) =  \
    \       ((s,t), (x,s,snd b) >> snd (mkex A B sch (s,exA) (snd b,exB)))";
    by (simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [mkex_def]) 1);
    by (cut_inst_tac [("exB","b>>exB")] mkex2_cons_2 1);
    by Auto_tac;
    qed"mkex_cons_2";

    Goal "[| x:act A; x:act B |]  \
    \   ==>  mkex A B (x>>sch) (s,a>>exA) (t,b>>exB) = \
    \        ((s,t), (x,snd a,snd b) >> snd (mkex A B sch (snd a,exA) (snd b,exB)))";
    by (simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [mkex_def]) 1);
    by (cut_inst_tac [("exB","b>>exB"),("exA","a>>exA")] mkex2_cons_3 1);
    by Auto_tac;
    qed"mkex_cons_3";

    Delsimps [mkex2_UU,mkex2_nil,mkex2_cons_1,mkex2_cons_2,mkex2_cons_3];

    val composch_simps = [mkex_UU,mkex_nil,
                          mkex_cons_1,mkex_cons_2,mkex_cons_3];

    Addsimps composch_simps;

    (* ------------------------------------------------------------------ *)
    (*                      The following lemmata aim for                 *)
    (*             COMPOSITIONALITY   on    SCHEDULE     Level            *)
    (* ------------------------------------------------------------------ *)

    (* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
                 section   "Lemmas for ==>";
    (* ----------------------------------------------------------------------*)

    (* --------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
    (*    Lemma_2_1 :  tfilter(ex) and filter_act are commutative            *)
    (* --------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

    Goalw [filter_act_def,Filter_ex2_def]
       "filter_act$(Filter_ex2 (asig_of A)$xs)=\
    \   Filter (%a. a:act A)$(filter_act$xs)";

    by (simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [MapFilter,o_def]) 1);
    qed"lemma_2_1a";

    (* --------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
    (*    Lemma_2_2 : State-projections do not affect filter_act             *)
    (* --------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

    Goal
       "filter_act$(ProjA2$xs) =filter_act$xs &\
    \   filter_act$(ProjB2$xs) =filter_act$xs";

    by (pair_induct_tac "xs" [] 1);
    qed"lemma_2_1b";

    (* --------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
    (*             Schedules of A||B have only  A- or B-actions              *)
    (* --------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

    (* very similar to lemma_1_1c, but it is not checking if every action element of
       an ex is in A or B, but after projecting it onto the action schedule. Of course, this
       is the same proposition, but we cannot change this one, when then rather lemma_1_1c  *)

    Goal "!s. is_exec_frag (A||B) (s,xs) \
    \  --> Forall (%x. x:act (A||B)) (filter_act$xs)";

    by (pair_induct_tac "xs" [is_exec_frag_def,Forall_def,sforall_def] 1);
    (* main case *)
    by (safe_tac set_cs);
    by (REPEAT (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps trans_of_defs2 @
                                    [actions_asig_comp,asig_of_par]) 1));
    qed"sch_actions_in_AorB";

    (* --------------------------------------------------------------------------*)
                     section "Lemmas for <==";
    (* ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*)

    (*---------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Filtering actions out of mkex(sch,exA,exB) yields the oracle sch
                                 structural induction
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

    Goal "! exA exB s t. \
    \ Forall (%x. x:act (A||B)) sch  & \
    \ Filter (%a. a:act A)$sch << filter_act$exA &\
    \ Filter (%a. a:act B)$sch << filter_act$exB \
    \ --> filter_act$(snd (mkex A B sch (s,exA) (t,exB))) = sch";

    by (Seq_induct_tac "sch" [Filter_def,Forall_def,sforall_def,mkex_def] 1);

    (* main case *)
    (* splitting into 4 cases according to a:A, a:B *)
    by (Asm_full_simp_tac 1);
    by (safe_tac set_cs);

    (* Case y:A, y:B *)
    by (Seq_case_simp_tac "exA" 1);
    (* Case exA=UU, Case exA=nil*)
    (* These UU and nil cases are the only places where the assumption filter A sch<<f_act exA
       is used! --> to generate a contradiction using  ~a>>ss<< UU(nil), using theorems
       Cons_not_less_UU and Cons_not_less_nil  *)
    by (Seq_case_simp_tac "exB" 1);
    (* Case exA=a>>x, exB=b>>y *)
    (* here it is important that Seq_case_simp_tac uses no !full!_simp_tac for the cons case,
       as otherwise mkex_cons_3 would  not be rewritten without use of rotate_tac: then tactic
       would not be generally applicable *)
    by (Asm_full_simp_tac 1);

    (* Case y:A, y~:B *)
    by (Seq_case_simp_tac "exA" 1);
    by (Asm_full_simp_tac 1);

    (* Case y~:A, y:B *)
    by (Seq_case_simp_tac "exB" 1);
    by (Asm_full_simp_tac 1);

    (* Case y~:A, y~:B *)
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [asig_of_par,actions_asig_comp]) 1);
    qed"Mapfst_mkex_is_sch";

    (* generalizing the proof above to a tactic *)

    fun mkex_induct_tac sch exA exB =
        EVERY1[Seq_induct_tac sch [Filter_def,Forall_def,sforall_def,mkex_def,stutter_def],
               Asm_full_simp_tac,
               SELECT_GOAL (safe_tac set_cs),
               Seq_case_simp_tac exA,
               Seq_case_simp_tac exB,
               Asm_full_simp_tac,
               Seq_case_simp_tac exA,
               Asm_full_simp_tac,
               Seq_case_simp_tac exB,
               Asm_full_simp_tac,
               asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [asig_of_par,actions_asig_comp])
              ];

    (*---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Projection of mkex(sch,exA,exB) onto A stutters on A
                                 structural induction
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

    Goal "! exA exB s t. \
    \ Forall (%x. x:act (A||B)) sch & \
    \ Filter (%a. a:act A)$sch << filter_act$exA &\
    \ Filter (%a. a:act B)$sch << filter_act$exB \
    \ --> stutter (asig_of A) (s,ProjA2$(snd (mkex A B sch (s,exA) (t,exB))))";

    by (mkex_induct_tac "sch" "exA" "exB");

    qed"stutterA_mkex";

    Goal "[|  \
    \ Forall (%x. x:act (A||B)) sch ; \
    \ Filter (%a. a:act A)$sch << filter_act$(snd exA) ;\
    \ Filter (%a. a:act B)$sch << filter_act$(snd exB) |] \
    \ ==> stutter (asig_of A) (ProjA (mkex A B sch exA exB))";

    by (cut_facts_tac [stutterA_mkex] 1);
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [stutter_def,ProjA_def,mkex_def]) 1);
    by (REPEAT (etac allE 1));
    by (dtac mp 1);
    by (assume_tac 2);
    by (Asm_full_simp_tac 1);
    qed"stutter_mkex_on_A";

    (*---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Projection of mkex(sch,exA,exB) onto B stutters on B
                                 structural induction
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

    Goal "! exA exB s t. \
    \ Forall (%x. x:act (A||B)) sch & \
    \ Filter (%a. a:act A)$sch << filter_act$exA &\
    \ Filter (%a. a:act B)$sch << filter_act$exB \
    \ --> stutter (asig_of B) (t,ProjB2$(snd (mkex A B sch (s,exA) (t,exB))))";

    by (mkex_induct_tac "sch" "exA" "exB");

    qed"stutterB_mkex";

    Goal "[|  \
    \ Forall (%x. x:act (A||B)) sch ; \
    \ Filter (%a. a:act A)$sch << filter_act$(snd exA) ;\
    \ Filter (%a. a:act B)$sch << filter_act$(snd exB) |] \
    \ ==> stutter (asig_of B) (ProjB (mkex A B sch exA exB))";

    by (cut_facts_tac [stutterB_mkex] 1);
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [stutter_def,ProjB_def,mkex_def]) 1);
    by (REPEAT (etac allE 1));
    by (dtac mp 1);
    by (assume_tac 2);
    by (Asm_full_simp_tac 1);
    qed"stutter_mkex_on_B";

    (*---------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Filter of mkex(sch,exA,exB) to A after projection onto A is exA
            --  using zip$(proj1$exA)$(proj2$exA) instead of exA    --
            --           because of admissibility problems          --
                                 structural induction
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

    Goal "! exA exB s t. \
    \ Forall (%x. x:act (A||B)) sch & \
    \ Filter (%a. a:act A)$sch << filter_act$exA  &\
    \ Filter (%a. a:act B)$sch << filter_act$exB \
    \ --> Filter_ex2 (asig_of A)$(ProjA2$(snd (mkex A B sch (s,exA) (t,exB)))) =   \
    \     Zip$(Filter (%a. a:act A)$sch)$(Map snd$exA)";

    by (mkex_induct_tac "sch" "exB" "exA");

    qed"filter_mkex_is_exA_tmp";

    (*---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          zip$(proj1$y)$(proj2$y) = y   (using the lift operations)
                        lemma for admissibility problems
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

    Goal  "Zip$(Map fst$y)$(Map snd$y) = y";
    by (Seq_induct_tac "y" [] 1);
    qed"Zip_Map_fst_snd";

    (*---------------------------------------------------------------------------
          filter A$sch = proj1$ex   -->  zip$(filter A$sch)$(proj2$ex) = ex
             lemma for eliminating non admissible equations in assumptions
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

    Goal "!! sch ex. \
    \ Filter (%a. a:act AB)$sch = filter_act$ex  \
    \ ==> ex = Zip$(Filter (%a. a:act AB)$sch)$(Map snd$ex)";
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [filter_act_def]) 1);
    by (rtac (Zip_Map_fst_snd RS sym) 1);
    qed"trick_against_eq_in_ass";

    (*---------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Filter of mkex(sch,exA,exB) to A after projection onto A is exA
                           using the above trick
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

    Goal "!!sch exA exB.\
    \ [| Forall (%a. a:act (A||B)) sch ; \
    \ Filter (%a. a:act A)$sch = filter_act$(snd exA)  ;\
    \ Filter (%a. a:act B)$sch = filter_act$(snd exB) |]\
    \ ==> Filter_ex (asig_of A) (ProjA (mkex A B sch exA exB)) = exA";
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [ProjA_def,Filter_ex_def]) 1);
    by (pair_tac "exA" 1);
    by (pair_tac "exB" 1);
    by (rtac conjI 1);
    by (simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [mkex_def]) 1);
    by (stac trick_against_eq_in_ass 1);
    back();
    by (assume_tac 1);
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [filter_mkex_is_exA_tmp]) 1);
    qed"filter_mkex_is_exA";

    (*---------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Filter of mkex(sch,exA,exB) to B after projection onto B is exB
            --  using zip$(proj1$exB)$(proj2$exB) instead of exB    --
            --           because of admissibility problems          --
                                 structural induction
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

    Goal "! exA exB s t. \
    \ Forall (%x. x:act (A||B)) sch & \
    \ Filter (%a. a:act A)$sch << filter_act$exA  &\
    \ Filter (%a. a:act B)$sch << filter_act$exB \
    \ --> Filter_ex2 (asig_of B)$(ProjB2$(snd (mkex A B sch (s,exA) (t,exB)))) =   \
    \     Zip$(Filter (%a. a:act B)$sch)$(Map snd$exB)";

    (* notice necessary change of arguments exA and exB *)
    by (mkex_induct_tac "sch" "exA" "exB");

    qed"filter_mkex_is_exB_tmp";

    (*---------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Filter of mkex(sch,exA,exB) to A after projection onto B is exB
                           using the above trick
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

    Goal "!!sch exA exB.\
    \ [| Forall (%a. a:act (A||B)) sch ; \
    \ Filter (%a. a:act A)$sch = filter_act$(snd exA)  ;\
    \ Filter (%a. a:act B)$sch = filter_act$(snd exB) |]\
    \ ==> Filter_ex (asig_of B) (ProjB (mkex A B sch exA exB)) = exB";
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [ProjB_def,Filter_ex_def]) 1);
    by (pair_tac "exA" 1);
    by (pair_tac "exB" 1);
    by (rtac conjI 1);
    by (simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [mkex_def]) 1);
    by (stac trick_against_eq_in_ass 1);
    back();
    by (assume_tac 1);
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [filter_mkex_is_exB_tmp]) 1);
    qed"filter_mkex_is_exB";

    (* --------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
    (*                    mkex has only  A- or B-actions                    *)
    (* --------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

    Goal "!s t exA exB. \
    \ Forall (%x. x : act (A || B)) sch &\
    \ Filter (%a. a:act A)$sch << filter_act$exA  &\
    \ Filter (%a. a:act B)$sch << filter_act$exB \
    \  --> Forall (%x. fst x : act (A ||B))   \
    \        (snd (mkex A B sch (s,exA) (t,exB)))";

    by (mkex_induct_tac "sch" "exA" "exB");

    qed"mkex_actions_in_AorB";

    (* ------------------------------------------------------------------ *)
    (*           COMPOSITIONALITY   on    SCHEDULE      Level             *)
    (*                          Main Theorem                              *)
    (* ------------------------------------------------------------------ *)

    Goal
    "(sch : schedules (A||B)) = \
    \ (Filter (%a. a:act A)$sch : schedules A &\
    \  Filter (%a. a:act B)$sch : schedules B &\
    \  Forall (%x. x:act (A||B)) sch)";

    by (simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [schedules_def, has_schedule_def]) 1);
    by (safe_tac set_cs);
    (* ==> *)
    by (res_inst_tac [("x","Filter_ex (asig_of A) (ProjA ex)")] bexI 1);
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [compositionality_ex]) 2);
    by (simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [Filter_ex_def,ProjA_def,
                                     lemma_2_1a,lemma_2_1b]) 1);
    by (res_inst_tac [("x","Filter_ex (asig_of B) (ProjB ex)")] bexI 1);
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [compositionality_ex]) 2);
    by (simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [Filter_ex_def,ProjB_def,
                                     lemma_2_1a,lemma_2_1b]) 1);
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [executions_def]) 1);
    by (pair_tac "ex" 1);
    by (etac conjE 1);
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [sch_actions_in_AorB]) 1);

    (* <== *)

    (* mkex is exactly the construction of exA||B out of exA, exB, and the oracle sch,
       we need here *)
    ren "exA exB" 1;
    by (res_inst_tac [("x","mkex A B sch exA exB")] bexI 1);
    (* mkex actions are just the oracle *)
    by (pair_tac "exA" 1);
    by (pair_tac "exB" 1);
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [Mapfst_mkex_is_sch]) 1);

    (* mkex is an execution -- use compositionality on ex-level *)
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [compositionality_ex]) 1);
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps
                     [stutter_mkex_on_A, stutter_mkex_on_B,
                      filter_mkex_is_exB,filter_mkex_is_exA]) 1);
    by (pair_tac "exA" 1);
    by (pair_tac "exB" 1);
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [mkex_actions_in_AorB]) 1);
    qed"compositionality_sch";

    (* ------------------------------------------------------------------ *)
    (*           COMPOSITIONALITY   on    SCHEDULE      Level             *)
    (*                            For Modules                             *)
    (* ------------------------------------------------------------------ *)

    Goalw [Scheds_def,par_scheds_def]

    "Scheds (A||B) = par_scheds (Scheds A) (Scheds B)";

    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [asig_of_par]) 1);
    by (rtac set_ext 1);
    by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [compositionality_sch,actions_of_par]) 1);
    qed"compositionality_sch_modules";

    Delsimps compoex_simps;
    Delsimps composch_simps;