System.Mem.Weak

| Haskell Hierarchical Libraries (base package) | Contents | Index
System.Mem.Weak |
Portability | non-portable
Stability | experimental
Maintainer | libraries@haskell.org
Contents
The `Weak` type The general interface Specialised versions A precise semantics
Description
In general terms, a weak pointer is a reference to an object that is not followed by the garbage collector - that is, the existence of a weak pointer to an object has no effect on the lifetime of that object. A weak pointer can be de-referenced to find out whether the object it refers to is still alive or not, and if so to return the object itself. Weak pointers are particularly useful for caches and memo tables. To build a memo table, you build a data structure mapping from the function argument (the key) to its result (the value). When you apply the function to a new argument you first check whether the key/value pair is already in the memo table. The key point is that the memo table itself should not keep the key and value alive. So the table should contain a weak pointer to the key, not an ordinary pointer. The pointer to the value must not be weak, because the only reference to the value might indeed be from the memo table. So it looks as if the memo table will keep all its values alive for ever. One way to solve this is to purge the table occasionally, by deleting entries whose keys have died. The weak pointers in this library support another approach, called finalization. When the key referred to by a weak pointer dies, the storage manager arranges to run a programmer-specified finalizer. In the case of memo tables, for example, the finalizer could remove the key/value pair from the memo table. Another difficulty with the memo table is that the value of a key/value pair might itself contain a pointer to the key. So the memo table keeps the value alive, which keeps the key alive, even though there may be no other references to the key so both should die. The weak pointers in this library provide a slight generalisation of the basic weak-pointer idea, in which each weak pointer actually contains both a key and a value.
Synopsis
data Weak v
mkWeak :: k -> v -> Maybe (IO ()) -> IO (Weak v)
deRefWeak :: Weak v -> IO (Maybe v)
finalize :: Weak v -> IO ()
mkWeakPtr :: k -> Maybe (IO ()) -> IO (Weak k)
addFinalizer :: key -> IO () -> IO ()
mkWeakPair :: k -> v -> Maybe (IO ()) -> IO (Weak (k, v))
The `Weak` type
data Weak v
A weak pointer object with a key and a value. The value has type `v`. A weak pointer expresses a relationship between two objects, the key and the value: if the key is considered to be alive by the garbage collector, then the value is also alive. A reference from the value to the key does not keep the key alive. A weak pointer may also have a finalizer of type `IO ()`; if it does, then the finalizer will be run at most once, at a time after the key has become unreachable by the program ("dead"). The storage manager attempts to run the finalizer(s) for an object soon after the object dies, but promptness is not guaranteed. It is not guaranteed that a finalizer will eventually run, and no attempt is made to run outstanding finalizers when the program exits. Therefore finalizers should not be relied on to clean up resources - other methods (eg. exception handlers) should be employed, possibly in addition to finalisers. References from the finalizer to the key are treated in the same way as references from the value to the key: they do not keep the key alive. A finalizer may therefore ressurrect the key, perhaps by storing it in the same data structure. The finalizer, and the relationship between the key and the value, exist regardless of whether the program keeps a reference to the `Weak` object or not. There may be multiple weak pointers with the same key. In this case, the finalizers for each of these weak pointers will all be run in some arbitrary order, or perhaps concurrently, when the key dies. If the programmer specifies a finalizer that assumes it has the only reference to an object (for example, a file that it wishes to close), then the programmer must ensure that there is only one such finalizer. If there are no other threads to run, the runtime system will check for runnable finalizers before declaring the system to be deadlocked.
Instances
Typeable1 Weak
The general interface
mkWeak
:: k | key
-> v | value
-> Maybe (IO ()) | finalizer
-> IO (Weak v) | returns: a weak pointer object
Establishes a weak pointer to `k`, with value `v` and a finalizer. This is the most general interface for building a weak pointer.
deRefWeak :: Weak v -> IO (Maybe v)
Dereferences a weak pointer. If the key is still alive, then ``Just` v` is returned (where `v` is the value in the weak pointer), otherwise `Nothing` is returned. The return value of `deRefWeak` depends on when the garbage collector runs, hence it is in the `IO` monad.
finalize :: Weak v -> IO ()
Causes a the finalizer associated with a weak pointer to be run immediately.
Specialised versions
mkWeakPtr :: k -> Maybe (IO ()) -> IO (Weak k)
A specialised version of `mkWeak`, where the key and the value are the same object:
     mkWeakPtr key finalizer = mkWeak key key finalizer
addFinalizer :: key -> IO () -> IO ()
A specialised version of `mkWeakPtr`, where the `Weak` object returned is simply thrown away (however the finalizer will be remembered by the garbage collector, and will still be run when the key becomes unreachable). Note: adding a finalizer to a `ForeignPtr` using `addFinalizer` won't work as well as using the specialised version `addForeignPtrFinalizer` because the latter version adds the finalizer to the primitive ForeignPtr# object inside, whereas the generic `addFinalizer` will add the finalizer to the box. Optimisations tend to remove the box, which may cause the finalizer to run earlier than you intended. The same motivation justifies the existence of `addMVarFinalizer` and `mkWeakIORef` (the non-uniformity is accidental).
mkWeakPair :: k -> v -> Maybe (IO ()) -> IO (Weak (k, v))
A specialised version of `mkWeak` where the value is actually a pair of the key and value passed to `mkWeakPair`:
     mkWeakPair key val finalizer = mkWeak key (key,val) finalizer
The advantage of this is that the key can be retrieved by `deRefWeak` in addition to the value.
A precise semantics
The above informal specification is fine for simple situations, but matters can get complicated. In particular, it needs to be clear exactly when a key dies, so that any weak pointers that refer to it can be finalized. Suppose, for example, the value of one weak pointer refers to the key of another...does that keep the key alive? The behaviour is simply this: If a weak pointer (object) refers to an unreachable key, it may be finalized. Finalization means (a) arrange that subsequent calls to `deRefWeak` return `Nothing`; and (b) run the finalizer. This behaviour depends on what it means for a key to be reachable. Informally, something is reachable if it can be reached by following ordinary pointers from the root set, but not following weak pointers. We define reachability more precisely as follows A heap object is reachable if: It is a member of the root set. It is directly pointed to by a reachable object, other than a weak pointer object. It is a weak pointer object whose key is reachable. It is the value or finalizer of an object whose key is reachable.
Produced by Haddock version 0.7